General Assembly Lowers State Borrowing Limit While National Debt Keeps Climbing
Perhaps more significantly, the legislation, HB 493, now on Governor Corbett’s desk, reforms RACP by establishing a very public, precise matrix behind the projects that are awarded grants.
PMA Executive Director David N. Taylor said that House Floor Leader Mike Turzai (R-Allegheny) and bill sponsor Matt Gabler (R-Clearfield) deserve special praise for ensuring that the bill would make it to the Governor’s desk. There were only two dissenting votes in the House (Matt Bradford, D-Montgomery and Steve Santarsiero, D-Bucks) and unanimous support in the Senate.
“As Floor Leader Turzai said, ‘this is the first reduction in the debt ceiling for the redevelopment capital assistance program in its history,’" Taylor said. “It may be the first debt limit reduction in the history of Pennsylvania state government.”
The website of the Governor’s Budget Office defines RACP as a grant program designed for the acquisition and construction of regional economic, cultural, civic, and historical improvement projects. No one would argue with the intent.
But over the past 15 years two things happened that tinged the program with suspicion. First, the RACP debt ceiling increased by billions. It was $1.2 billion in 1999, but in 2005 it soared to $2.65 billion, and then to $4.05 billion in 2010.
Unfortunately, the process of awarding the grants became increasingly political.
“When we increased the debt ceiling, the deal was that each caucus would have $50 million to decide what projects to fund and the Governor would get the rest,” said one legislative source. “It was entirely up to them what to do with the money.”
At the time, then Governor Ed Rendell argued that the state’s credit rating remained high and the projects created jobs statewide. But at the end of his administration some questioned the increasing debt limit and his awarding funds to projects similar to the Arlen Specter Library in Philadelphia and the John P. Murtha Center in Johnstown.
The Governor’s Press Secretary, Jay Pagni, said that under the changes a system of metrics has to be followed. The changes instill competition into which projects are funded. In addition, business plans and realistic figures on the number of jobs created are required. There is also a greater emphasis placed on the project being shovel-ready.
“Some projects never left the waiting list after being approved by the General Assembly,” Pagni said. “In some cases, the state would award an initial grant to a project what wasn’t close to being ready. The state was still on the hook for the money.”
Under the new system, a project is removed from consideration after ten years and must receive legislative approval before being placed back on the waiting list.